Whitepaper · v1

WizGank documentation

WizGank turns AI debate into an arcane spell-duel. You give two options; two AI wizards argue opposite sides; a neutral Arbiter scores every argument as damage. It’s a way to watch ideas clash on their merits — judged on substance, not popularity.

1 · Overview

Most “AI debate” demos are walls of text. WizGank makes the clash legible: a 3D ritual circle, a live transcript of spells, a ward bar draining with every landed point, and a clear verdict at the end. The metaphor is a duel, but the engine is a real multi-model debate plus an independent judge.

One-liner: Two casters. One survives.
Core promise: No sycophancy — the spell is judged, not the caster.

2 · The duel

A duel is a head-to-head comparison: X vs Y. The blue corner champions X; the red corner champions Y. Each argues why its option is the better one.

Structure

Verdicts

3 · The casters

Four wizards, each a live AI with a distinct temperament. Same underlying model, different persona — so the style of the argument differs, never the judging.

NOVA
NOVA · Fire
The flare. Hot-headed and bold; reframes the matchup and hits with the boldest framing.
GLACE
GLACE · Ice
The frost. Cold and surgical; wins on clean logic and by dismantling sloppy reasoning.
SURGE
SURGE · Storm
The storm. Fast and kinetic; builds momentum and strikes from an unexpected angle.
UMBRA
UMBRA · Void
The void. Quiet and strategic; sees the second-order argument and the long game.

4 · The Arbiter

The Arbiter

The Arbiter is a separate AI judge and the reason WizGank isn’t a popularity contest. It runs as its own call, blind to which caster made the argument. It scores only the substance — logic, evidence, relevance, and persuasive force — and returns an integer damage value plus a terse note.

Because the judge never knows who spoke, a weaker-branded option can still win if it’s argued better, and a fan-favorite can lose if its case is thin. That’s the whole point.

5 · Under the hood

WizGank is a working product, not a mockup.

Stack

Per-cast pipeline

caster(persona, matchup, transcript)  ->  { spell, argument }
arbiter(argument, matchup)            ->  { damage 4..30, note }
opponent.ward -= damage

Spells stream into the transcript as they resolve, the ward bars update, and the ring pulses on each hit. A full duel is at most 6 caster calls + 6 Arbiter calls.

6 · Tokenomics

Contract address
TBA
Buy on pump.fun

7 · Safety

8 · Roadmap

9 · FAQ

Is WizGank financial advice?
No. It’s an entertainment product about AI debate. $WIZGANK is a memecoin with no intrinsic value. Do your own research.
Can a duel be a draw?
Yes — if both wards are equal after three rounds, it’s a Stalemate.
Why do the same two casters give different results?
The models are sampled with some randomness and read the running transcript, so each duel plays out differently. The Arbiter still scores each argument on its own merits.
Do I need a wallet to duel?
No. Duels are free and anonymous — no login, no wallet. The token only unlocks planned extras.

WizGank is an entertainment product about AI debate. $WIZGANK is a memecoin with no intrinsic value or expectation of return. Nothing in this document is financial advice.

Enter the circle →